Thirteen steps for office hysteroscopy with minimal discomfort

Ricardo Bassil Lasmar* and Bernardo Portugal Lasmar

Published: 27 June, 2019 | Volume 2 - Issue 1 | Pages: 034-037

The Office hysteroscopy (OH) is a important procedure to make diagnosis and sometimes, treatment, of intrauterine pathology, without getting the patient to Operating Room. Its advantages are very well known: less costs, fast diagnosis, see and treat and several others. It's mainly difficulty is the discomfort during the procedure. To stimule to grow the number of gynecologist to leave OR and to go to office hysteroscopy, we propose thirteen steps for office hysteroscopy with minimal discomfort.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.cjog.1001021 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF


  1. Cicinelli E, Parisi C, Galantino P. Reliability, feasibility, and safety of minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach: experience with 6,000 cases. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80: 199-202. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2X2Nh17 
  2. De Angelis C, Santoro G, Re ME, Nofroni I. Office hysteroscopy and compliance: mini-hysteroscopy versus traditional hysteroscopy in a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 2441-2445. : https://bit.ly/2Fy1xsI  
  3. Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L. What does "diagnostic hysteroscopy' mean today? The role of the new techniques.. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 15: 303-308. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2YpBdZ2
  4. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Zizolfi B, Lodhi W, Bifulco G, Fernandez L, et al. See and treat' outpatient hysteroscopy with novel fibreoptic 'Alphascope'. J ObstetGynaecol. 2012; 32: 298-300.
  5. Guida M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Acunzo G, Sparice S, Bramante S, et al. Vaginoscopic versus traditional office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21: 3253–3257. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2XDGIpW
  6. Paulo AA, Solheiro MH, Paulo CO. Is pain better tolerated with minihysteroscopy than with conventional device? A systematic review and meta-analysis: hysteroscopy scope size and pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 292: 987-994. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2KFz5t3
  7. Craciunas L, Sajid MS, Howell R. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as distension medium for diagnostic hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 1709-14.e1-4. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2KGkvSi
  8. Mazzon I, Favilli A, Horvath S, Grasso M, Di Renzo GC, et al. Pain during diagnostic hysteroscopy: what is the role of the cervical canal? A pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 183: 169-173. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2LnZZoX
  9. Lasmar RB, Bruno RV, Santos RLC, Lasmar BP. Histeroscopia do Lasmar Tratado de Ginecologia. 553-564, Guanabara Koogan. 2017.
  10. Centini G, Troia L, Lazzeri L, Petraglia F, Luisi S. Modern operative hysteroscopy. Minerva Ginecol. 2016; 68: 126-132.
  11. Lasmar RB, Barrozo PRM, Oliveira MAP, Coutinho ESF. Validation of hysteroscopic view in cases of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2006; 13: 409-412. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2Ner5Bq


Figure 1

Figure 1

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?