Trans-abdominal cervical cerclage revisited
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Changes in contemporary obstetric and gynaecological practice in relation to ultrasound cervical screening during pregnancy, the treatment of intra-epithelial cervical neoplasia and laparoscopic surgery have resulted in an increased utilization of trans-abdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage in an attempt to reduce the incidence of mid-trimester and early preterm birth in women with repeated pregnancy loss.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2019 Svigos J
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Benson RC, Durfee RB. Transabdominal cervico uterine cerclage during pregnancy for the treatment of cervical incompetency. Obstet Gynecol. 1965; 25: 145–155. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2Zpb9gP
Harger JH. Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence based analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100: 1313–1327. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2IK1FGi
Berghella V, Odiba AO, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM. Cerclage for short Cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106: 181–189. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2XeAr3L
Simcox R, Seed PT, Bennett P, Teoh TG, Poston L, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cervical scanning vs history to determine cerclage in women at high risk of preterm birth (CIRCLE trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200: 623.e1–6. Ref.: http://bit.ly/31ySVLV
Incerti M, Ghidini A, Locatelli A, Poggi S, Pezzullo JC. Cervical length < 25 mm in low risk women: a case control study of cerclage with rest versus rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 315.e1-e4. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2wVpJR3
Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 663–671. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2ZrZyOg
Namouz S, Porat S, Okun N, Windrim R, Farine D. Emergency Cerclage: Literature Review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013; 68: 379–388. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2RieOuj
Aarts JM, Brons JT, Bruinse HW. Emergency Cerclage; a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1995; 50:459-469. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2KQwH1P
Weiner CP, Lee KY, Buhimschi CS, Christner R, Buhimschi IA. Proteomic biomarkers that predict the clinical success of rescue cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 710-718. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2MPH2xS
Zaveri V, Aghajafari F, Amankwah K, Hannah M. Abdominal versus vaginal cerlage: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 868-872. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2Zrk5Cm
Lotgering FK, Gaugler-Senden IP, Lotgering SF, Wallenburg HC. Outcome after transbdominl cervicoisthmic cerclage. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107: 779-784. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2RerQZw
Debbs RH, DeLa Vega GA, Pearson S, Sehdev H, Marchiano D, et al. Transabdominal cerclage after comprehensive evaluation of women with previous unsuccessful transvaginal cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 317.e1. Ref.: http://bit.ly/31BPL9Y
Lee SM, Jun JK. Prediction and prevention of preterm birth after cervical conisation. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 21: 207-208. Ref.: http://bit.ly/31BQbgy
Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intra epithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006; 367:489-498. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2RieYlp
Bergehella V, Pereira L, Gariepy A, Simonazzi G. Prior cone biopsy: prediction of preterm birth by cervical ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 1393-1397. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2WHHA8v
Kyrgiou M, Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Paraskevaidis E. Increased risk of preterm birth after treatment for CIN. BMJ. 2012; 345: e5847. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2WIwdgL
Chesson HW, Ekwueme DU, Saraiya M, Dunne EF, Markowitz LE. Estimates of the timing of reductions in genital warts and high grade cervical Intraepithelial neoplasia after onset of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in the United States. Vaccine. 2013; 31: 3899-3905. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2KlBhpo
NICE: Interventional procedure overview of laparoscopic cerclage for prevention of recurrent pregnancy loss due to cervical incompetence 2007.
Interventional Procedures Programme 379-497.
NICE: Interventional Procedure Overview: Laparoscopic cerclage for cervical incompetence to prevent late miscarriage or preterm birth 2018; 1-46.
Moawad GN, Tyan P, Bracke T, Abi Khalil ED, Vargas V, et al: Systematic review of transabdominal cerclage placement for the prevention of preterm birth. J Minim Invas Gynec. 2018; 25: 277-286. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2WIrMao
Zeybek B, Hill A, Menderes G, Borahay MA, Azodi M, et al. Robot-assisted abdominal cerclasge during pregnancy. J Soc Laparoendoscopic Surg. 2016; 20: e2016.00072. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2KqDDUj
Ades A, Parghi S, Aref-Adib M. Laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage: Outcomes of 121 pregnancies. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 58: 606-611. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2wUQ69R
Svigos JM. Personal series of 30 consecutive cases of open transabdominal cerclage (Unpublished data). Hawkins E, Nimaroff M. Vaginal erosion of an abdominal cerclage of an abdominal cerclage 7 years after laparoscopic placement. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 420-423. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2RgqI7X
Gibb D, Saridogan E. The role of transabdominal cervical cerclage techniques in maternity care. The Obstet & Gynaec. 2016; 18: 117-125. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2MMHKvG
Whittle WL, Singh SS, Allen L, Glaude L, Thomas J, et al. Laparoscopic cervico-isthmic cerclage: surgical technique and obstetric outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 364.e1-e7. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2IfNMRb
Burger NB, Brölmann HA, Einarsson JI, Langebrekke A, Huirne JA. Effectiveness of abdominal cerclage placed via laparotomy or laparoscopy: systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011; 18: 696-704. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2MPJaFS
Carlisle N, Ridout A, Shennan AH. Successful vaginal delivery following an abdominal cerclage removal in pre-term labour. Int J Obstet Gynaecol Study. 2017; 1: 1003. Ref.: http://bit.ly/2II8gBc