More Information

Submitted: 23 December 2019| Approved: 26 March 2020 | Published: 27 March 2020

How to cite this article: Shanthini M, Dash M, Chitra AF, Jayanthi S, Sujatha P. Effectiveness of prenatal intensive counselling on knowledge, attitude and acceptance of post placental intrauterine contraceptive device among mothers Clin J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 3: 021-025.

DOI: 10.29328/journal.cjog.1001044

Copyright License: © 2020 Shanthini M, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 FullText PDF

Effectiveness of prenatal intensive counselling on knowledge, attitude and acceptance of post placental intrauterine contraceptive device among mothers

M Shanthini1, Manjubala Dash2*, A Felicia Chitra3, S Jayanthi4 and P Sujatha5

1Department of Nursing, India
2Department OBG, MTPG & RIHS, Puducherry, India
3Principal, HOD, Department of MSN, India
4Dean , MTPG & RIHS, Puducherry, India
5Medical Superintendent, RGGWCH, Puducherry, India

*Address for Correspondence: Manjubala Dash, Professor in Nursing, HOD, Department of OB & GY Nursing, Puducherry, India, Email: manju_narayan@rediffmail.com; shanthinimanikasamy@gmail.com

Introduction: Contraception is a method or device used to prevent pregnancy. In the first year of postpartum period around 65% of women are having unmet need of family planning. Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device is not only advantageous to the women and couples; even the service providers benefit from PPIUCD. PPIUCD insertion on the same delivery table saves time and separate clinical procedure is not required.

Methodology: The Quantitiative Pre-Experimental One Group Pre and Post Test research design was used. 70 Antenatal mothers were selected by using Purposive Sampling Technique who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and who were available during the period of data collection at selected hospital, Puducherrry. Data was collected by using Structured Interview Schedule.

Result: The Pre test mean score of Knowledge was 9.98 ± 2.38 and Post Test mean score of Knowledge was 14.91 ± 1.15. The calculated paired‘t’ value was (-20.82) found to be statistically significant at p < 0.001 level. The Pretest mean score of Attitude was 34.67 ± 5.67 and Post test mean score of Attitude was 44.27 ± 4.70. The calculated paired‘t’ value was (-17.25) found to be statistically significant at p < 0.001 level. The Pretest mean score of Acceptance was 0.11 ± 0.320 and Post Test mean score of Acceptance was 0.29 ± 0.455. The paired‘t’ value of t = -3.778 found to be statistically significant at p < 0.001 level. The Demographic and Obstetrical Variables like age at marriage, previous childbirth and decision maker of family about family planning have shown significant association with Post Test level of Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of PPIUCD at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001.

Conclusion: The researcher concluded that Prenatal Intensive Counselling increases the mother’s Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of PPIUCD. So Prenatal Intensive Counselling on PPIUCD can be given to Antenatal Mothers during their antenatal visits to meet the unmet needs of family planning.

Contraception is a method or device used to prevent pregnancy. CuT-380A is an Intrauterine Contraceptive Device provides contraception up to 10 years. In the first year of postpartum period around 65% of women are having unmet need of family planning. Lack of information, fear of side effects and complications are the common reasons for unmet need [1]. Family Planning is important not only for population stabilization, but also to improve maternal and child health in our country. According to 2012 report of UNFPA, WHO and World Bank India contributes 20% of maternal deaths worldwide. If couples spaced their pregnancies for at least 2 years apart, family planning can prevent more than 30% of maternal deaths and 10% of child mortality [2-4]. Due to case load of deliveries, the Government of India has introduced Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device in the National Family Planning Programme since 2012. Selecting the mother and motivating them during antenatal period is an easier task than asking the mother to visit after 6 weeks for insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device [5].

Counselling for postpartum contraception can be given during prenatal care visits or it can be given after birth or both. Postpartum contraceptive counselling during the prenatal period is usually neglected. Contraceptive counselling during routine prenatal care visits, especially in the third trimester according to the needs of couples might increase the use of postpartum contraception [6-8].

In India, approximately 27% birth occur within 24 months of delivery. Intrauterine contraceptive device is one of the good opinion and most effective method for spacing pregnancies. PPIUCD is not only advantageous to the women and couples; even the service providers benefit from PPIUCD. PPIUCD insertion on the same delivery table saves time and separate clinical procedure is not required [9-11].

The acceptance of PPIUCD is low due to lack of awareness among the staff and the client. Inpite of making contraception widely available, there is poor acceptance of contraception due to ignorance and fear of complications. Inadequate knowledge about contraceptive method and incomplete information about their use are the main reasons for not accepting the family planning [12,13].

To assess the existing level of Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (PPIUCD) among Antenatal Mothers. To assess the level of Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (PPIUCD) among the Mothers after Prenatal Intensive Counselling.

To evaluate the Effectiveness of Prenatal Intensive Counselling on Acceptance of Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device among Intranasal mothers.

To correlate the Post test Knowledge and Attitude, Knowledge and Acceptance and Attitude and Acceptance among the Mothers.

To associate the Post test level of Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of PPIUCD with their selected Demographic and Obstetrical variables.

The Quantitative Pre-experimental One Group Pre and Post Test research design was used to conduct the research at selected hospital, Puducherry. 70 Antenatal mothers were selected by using Purposive sampling for the study who fulfilled the inclusion criteria such as mothers who were primigravida admitted at term pregnancy, multigravida who were not willing for tubectomy, planned for induction, elective caesarean section and willing to participate in the study. The mothers who had multiple pregnancy and who does not know either Tamil or English were excluded from the study. Structured Interview Schedule was used to collect the data. The structured questionnaire comprised of A,B, C and D sections. Section A consist of Demographic and Obstetric Variables. Section B consist of Knowledge questionnaire, Section C comprised of five point likert scale to assess the Attitude of mothers and Section D consist of checklist to assess the Acceptance of PPIUCD. Written and Oral informed consent was obtained from each mother prior to data collection. Pre-test was done to all the mothers during antenatal period who were admitted to antenatal ward. Prenatal Intensive Counselling was given on same day after Pretest which comprised of definition, misconception, benefits, mechanism of action, side effects and care after insertion of PPIUCD. The researcher followed up all the mothers who accepted for PPIUCD insertion in labour room and witnessed for insertion of PPIUCD during their intranasal period. The Post Test was carried out with the same tool by using Structured Interview Schedule after 7th day of intervention during postnatal period. The collected data was analyzed by using descriptive and inferential statistics.

The result showed that majority 42 (60%) mothers belonged to the age group of 21-25 years, 66 (94.2%) mothers were Hindus, Graduate and Post Graduate mothers were 33 (47.1%), 65 (92.9%) mothers were homemakers, 22 (31.4%) mothers had family income of less than Rs.5000, 49 (70%) mothers belonged to joint family, 35 (50%) mothers married at the age of 15-20 years, 66 (94.3%) were prim mothers, 45 (64.3%) mothers said husband is the decision maker of the family, 63 (70%) mothers had no previous history of temporary contraception, 62 (88.6%) mothers have not adopted to any contraceptive methods, 40 (57.1%) mothers had previous knowledge of PPIUCD and 25 (35.7%) mothers said health personnel is the main source of information about PPIUCD (Table 1).

Table 1: Distribution of Demographic and Obstetrical Variables of Antenatal Mothers. n =70
Sl.no Demographic and obstetrical variables Frequency  (n) Percentage (%)
1 Age of women
  15-20 years 18 25.7
21-25 years 42 60
26-30 years 9 12.9
31-35 years 1 1.4
36-40 years 0 0
2 Religion
  Hindu 66 94.2
Muslim 2 2.9
Christian 2 2.9
3 Educational status
  Illiterate 2 2.9
Higher secondary education 23 32.9
High school education 12 17.1
Graduate and post graduate 33 47.1
4 Occupation
  Home maker 65 92.9
Unskilled 3 4.3
Skilled 1 1.4
Professional 1 1.4
5 Family income
  Less than 5000 22 31.4
Rs.5000-80000 15 21.4
Rs.8000-10000 15 21.4
More than 10000 18 25.7
6 Types of family
  Nuclear family 21 30
Joint family 49 70
7 Age at marriage
  15-20 years 35 50
21-25 years 31 44.3
26-30 years 4 5.7
31-35 years 0 0
8 Parity
  Primi gravid 66 94.3
Multi gravid 4 5.7
9 Number of children
  Nil 66 94.3
One 4 5.7
Two 0 0
10 Previous child birth
  Nil 66 94.4
Less than 1 year 1 1.4
1-2 years 1 1.4
2-4 years 1 1.4
More than 4 years 1 1.4
11 Decision maker in your family for family planning
  Husband 45 64.3
Both 13 18.6
Mother in law 12 17.1
Any other 0 0
12 Previous history of temporary contraception
  Yes 7 30
No 63 70
13 Method of adoption
  Nil 62 88.6
Oral pills 1 1.4
Condom 3 4.3
Copper T 4 5.7
Any other 0 0
14 Previous Knowledge of PPIUCD
  Yes 40 57.1
No 30 42.9
15 Source of information about PPIUCD (n=40)
  Mass media 1 2.5
Education 4 10.0
Social circle 10 25.0
Health personnel 25 62.5%

In our study majority of the participants were belong to the age group of 21 to 25 years. Except 2 participants all others had formal education. Nearly 93% of participants were home maker. None of the participants had more than two children. Only 1% of participants were used any kind of contraceptive method. Among the participants who were previously heard about the PPICUCD, health personnel were the major source of information.

The post test scores of all parameters studied such as knowledge and Attitude of PPIUCD were higher that pre test score. This clearly states that Prenatal Intensive Counselling can significantly improve Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of PPIUCD (Table 2).

Table 2: Comparison of Pre and Post Test level of Knowledge and Attitude regarding Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device among Mothers. N=70
Variables Mean Standard Deviation Median Min, Max ‘Paired- t’ Test p value
Pre-Test level of Knowledge 9.98 2.36 10 5,16 -20.82 0.000***
Post-Test level of Knowledge 14.91 1.15 16 13,18
Pretest level of Attitude 34.67 5.67 35 19,48 -17.25 0.000***

The correlation between Post Test mean score of Knowledge was 14.91 ± 1.15 and the Post Test mean score of Attitude was 44.27 ± 4.70. The calculated Karl Pearson’s correlation value of r = 0.227 shows positive correlation. This clearly indicates that when the mothers have adequate Knowledge regarding PPIUCD they developed positive Attitude towards PPIUCD. The correlation between Post Test mean score of Attitude was 44.27 ± 4.70 and the Post Test mean score of Acceptance was 0.29 ± 0.455. The calculated Karl Pearson’s correlation value of r = 0.546 shows positive correlation which was found to be statistically significant at p < 0.001. This clearly indicates that when the Mothers have positive Attitude towards PPIUCD they were ready to accept for PPIUCD insertion. The correlation between Post Test mean score of Knowledge was 0.29 ± 0.455 and the Post Test mean score of Acceptance was 14.91 ± 1.15. The calculated Karl Pearson’s correlation value of r = 0.103 shows positive correlation. This clearly indicates that though the Mothers have adequate Knowledge regarding PPIUCD they were not ready to accept for PPIUCD insertion (Table 3).

Table 3: Correlation of Post Test Knowledge and Attitude, Attitude and Acceptance and Knowledge and Acceptance among Mothers. n = 70
Correlation (Post-Test) Mean Standard Deviation r value p value
Level of Knowledge 14.91 1.15 .227 .055
Level of Attitude 44.27 4.70
Level of Attitude 44.27 4.70 0.546 0.000***
Acceptance Rate 0.29 0.455
Level of Knowledge 0.29 0.455 0.103 0.397
Acceptance Rate 14.91 1.15

The Demographic and Obstetrical Variables have not shown significant association with Post Test level of Knowledge. The Demographic and Obstetrical Variables like previous childbirth and age at marriage have shown significant association with Post Test level of Attitude at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001. The Variables like decision maker in your family for family planning have shown significant association with Post Test level of Acceptance at p < 0.05. OtherDemographic and Obstetrical Variables have not shown significant association with Post Test level of Attitude and Acceptance regarding PPIUCD (Table 4).

Table 4: Association of Post Test level of Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device among Mothers with selected Demographic and Obstetrical Variables. n = 70
Sl. no Dmographic and obstetrical variables Level of attitude χ2 df p value
neutral positive
n % n %
1. Age at Marriage   7.97   2 .019*
  15-20 years 1 2.9 34 97.1
21-25 years 0 0 31 100
26-30 years 0 0 0 0
31-35 years 1 25 3 75
2. Previous child birth         34.5 4 .000***
  Nil 1 1.5 65 98.5
Less than 1 year 0 0 1 100
1-2 years 1 100 0 0
2-4 years 0 0 1 100
More than 4 years 0 0 1 100
Sl.no Demographic and obstetrical variables Acceptance χ2 df p value
not
accepted
accepted
n % n %
1. Decision maker in your family for family planning 6.85 2 .032*
  Husband 36 80 9 20
Both 9 69.2 4 30.8
Mother in law 5 41.7 7 58.3
Any other 0 0 0 0

In this study, the result highlights that majority 56(80%) mothers had Moderate Knowledge, 9(12.9%) mothers had Adequate Knowledge and 5(7.1%) mothers had Inadequate Knowledge. In Pretest level of Attitude majority of 42(60%) mothers had Positive Attitude, 27(38.6%) mothers had Neutral Attitude and 1(1.4%) mother had Negative Attitude. In Pretest majority of 62(89%) mothers not Accepted and 8(11%) mothers Accepted for Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (PPIUCD) insertion.

The present study was supported by the author Geetha Katheit, (2013) conducted a Prospective Longitudinal Study on “Evaluation of Post Placental Intrauterine Device (PPIUCD) in terms of awareness, acceptance and expulsion in a tertiary care centre” among 503 women counseled 397 women accepted for PPIUCD insertion [14].

Similar study was conducted by Sonali Deshpande, (2017) “Awareness, Acceptability and Clinical Outcome of Post Placental Insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device” among 1944 women visiting antenatal clinic. The result showed that out of 1944 women, only 78(4%) of women were aware of PPIUCD. 25% of women accepted to put PPIUCD and 37% of women had complications [15].

In Post Test, majority of 69(98.6%) mothers had Adequate Knowledge and 1(1.4%) mother had Moderate Knowledge. In Post Test level of Attitude, majority of 68(97.1%) mothers had Positive Attitude and 2(2.9%) mothers had Neutral Attitude. In Post Test Acceptance, majority of 50(71%) mothers not Accepted and 20(29%) mothers Accepted for Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device insertion. So when the mothers have Adequate Knowledge and Positive Attitude they were ready to Accept for Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device insertion (PPIUCD). The present study was supported by the author Putu Ayu Ratna Darmayanti, (2018) conducted a randomized controlled trail on “Difference in Post-Placental Intrauterine Device Acceptance with and without couples Counselling in private practice midwifery clinics, West Denpasar” among 58 pregnant women. The finding showed that 10 women (34.48%) in control group and 21 women (72.41%) women in interventional group Accepted to put PPIUCD [16].

The present study was supported by another study conducted by Dr. Serah Wanjiru Ndegwa, (2007) “Effect of Two level of Counselling on Acceptance, uptake and Early Outcomes of the Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device” among 127 women out of which 64 were given Intensive Counselling and 63 were given routine family planning counseling. The finding showed that 71% of women accepted for PPIUCD insertion. Continuation rate was 91%, client satisfaction was 88% and partner satisfaction was 77% at 6 weeks [17].

Replication of the study may be done with large samples in different settings to validate and generalize the findings.

Study can also be conducted in community setting.

Effectiveness of Intensive Counselling on Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of Post-Partum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device among Postnatal Mothers.

Comparative study between prenatal intensive counselling and routine family counselling on acceptance of Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device among Mothers.

In present study, the post test scores of all parameters studied such as knowledge and Attitude of PPIUCD were higher that pretest score. This clearly states that Prenatal Intensive Counselling can significantly improve Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of PPIUCD. Similar study was supported by the author ManoranjaniGara, (2014) on “Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on PPIUCD among Primigravida Mothers in selected MCH centre, Tripathi” among 55 Primigravida mothers. The finding showed that there was a significant difference between Pre and Posttest level of Knowledge [18].

The study result revealed that Effectiveness of Prenatal Intensive Counselling on Knowledge, Attitude and Acceptance of Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (PPIUCD) among the Mothers. In Post Test the Mothers gained Adequate Knowledge, developed Positive Attitude and Accepted for Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device insertion. So, Prenatal Intensive Counselling on Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device can be given to Antenatal Mothers during their antenatal visits to meet the unmet needs of family planning.

  1. Shaanthy TK. A cross sectional study on willingness and acceptability: PPIUCD by primipara mothers at a tertiary care hospital, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Reproductive, Contraceptive, Obstetrics, Gynecol. 2017; 6: 3030-3034.
  2. IUCD Reference Manual for MOs and Nursing Personnel; 2013. http://www.nrhmtn.gov.in/modules/IUCD_Reference_Manual_for_MOs_and_Nursing_Pwersonne_-Final-Sept_2013.pdf.
  3. Chauhan R. Evaluation of acceptability, safety and expulsion of PPIUCD, India. Int J Reproductive, Contraception, Obstetrics, Gynecol. 2018; 3: 1083-1089.
  4. Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, et al. Family Planning: The unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006; 368: 1810-1827. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17113431
  5. Janwadkar A. Acceptance, perception, experience and satisfaction of the couple with postpartum intrauterine, contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) insertion, Pune. Asian Pacific J Health Sci. 2016; 3 55-64.
  6. Cwiak C, Gellasch T, Zieman M. Peripartum contraceptive attitudes and practices. Contraception. 2004; 70: 383-386. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15504377
  7. Engin-Ustün Y, Ustün Y, Cetin F, Meydanli MM, Kafkasli A, et al. Effect of postpartum counselling on postpartum contraceptive use. Arch Gynaecol Obstet. 2007; 275: 429-432. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17136370
  8. Akman M1, Tüzün S, Uzuner A, Başgul A, Kavak Z. The Influence of prenatal counselling on Postpartum contraceptive choice, Turkey. J Int Med Res. 2010; 38: 1243-1249. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20925996
  9. Nelson A. Intrauterine contraceptive. J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 6: 219-224.
  10. Postpartum IUCD Insertion Manual. Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi 110001: Family Planing Division. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India; 2010.
  11. Sharma A. A study of awareness and factors affecting Acceptance of PPIUCD in South-East Rajasthan, India. Int J Community Medicine and Public Health. 2017; 4: 2706-2710.
  12. Sanskriti P. Post-partum intrauterine device insertion: the unfinished agenda. New Indian J Surg. 2011; 2: 245-247.
  13. Bhasin SK, Pant M, Mehta M, Kumar S. Prevalence of usage of different contraceptive methods in East Delhi-a cross sectional study. Indian J Community Med. 2005; 30: 53-5.
  14. Katheit G. Evaluation of post-placental intrauterine device (PPIUCD) in terms of awareness, Acceptance and expulsion in a tertiary care centre, Madhya Pradesh. Int J Reproductive, Contraception, Obstetrics, Gynecol. 2013; 2: 539-543.
  15. Deshpande S. Awareness, acceptability and clinical outcome of post placental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device in Marathwada region, India. Indian J Obstetrics, Gynecol Res. 2017; 4: 77-82.
  16. Darmayanti PA. Differences in Post Placental Intrauterine Device acceptance with and without couples counselling in private practice midwifery clinics, West Denpasar. Public Health and Preventive Medicine Archive. 2018; 6: 4-9.
  17. Ndegwa SW. The effect of two levels of counselling on acceptance, uptake and early outcome of the post placental intrauterine contraceptive device. Nairob. University of Nairob medical library. 2007; 1-30.
  18. Gara M. Effectiveness of Structured teaching Programme on PPIUCD (Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device among Primigravida Mothers in Selected MCH centre, Tirupati, India. Int J Practical Nursing. 2014; 2: 87-91.